Saturday, November 7, 2015

Will Japan Post's Huge IPO Teach the U.S. Post Office to Privatize?

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-11-06/will-japan-post-s-huge-ipo-teach-the-u-s-post-office-to-privatize-

Japan Post went public this week and managed to raise $12 billion, making a national mail carrier responsible for this year's most successful initial public offering. That’s a lot of money at a time when mail is disappearing and the U.S. Postal Service, the world’s largest deliverer of letters and parcels, is awash in red ink.
Much of the American commentary about the Japan Post Holdings IPO has noted how differently the Japanese run their postal service. In 2014, for instance, mail delivery accounted for only 12 percent of Japan Post’s revenue—and 74 percent came from such nondelivery businesses as life insurance sold at 24,646 post offices. Another 14 percent flowed from banking operations. Japan Post sold shares in the three businesses and plans eventually to spin them off as separate companies.  
By contrast, 95 percent of USPS sales come from transporting mail. And unlike their Japanese counterparts, American letter carriers make their appointed rounds in aging white trucks rather than red scooters.   
But there is an important similarity between the Japanese and American postal services: Both organizations have endured sharp declines in their mail volume. In the fiscal year ended March, Japan Post delivered 18 billion pieces—or 3 billion fewer than in 2007—and that helps explains its ongoing transformation into a package delivery company. Earlier this year, Japan Post paid $4.6 billion for Toll Holdings, an Australian logistics company, which made the postal service more attractive to investors. 
That's a proven strategy. In the first major postal privatization, Deutsche Post conducted a successful IPO after purchasing 50 percent of DHL, the international parcel delivery company. Deutsche Post shares went on to attract considerable attention for investors during the 2000 IPO. At the time, USPS also talked about going private. But postal worker unions and their allies in President Bill Clinton's White House didn’t want to hear about it. And there’s been no talk of privatizing the American postal service.  
Perhaps the successful Japan Post IPO will get people in Washington thinking more adventurously again. Last year, the USPS delivered 155 billion mail pieces, or 27 percent fewer than the peak reached in 2006. The package segment was the only part of the business that increased by volume, up by a healthy 8 percent. 
Naturally, the USPS is trying to morph into more of a package delivery operation too. But its white trucks are 25 years old, and they were designed when the USPS transported more letters than anything else. The USPS hopes to replace its fleet of 190,000 vehicles—at a likely cost of $5 billion. The government agency, which had a $5.5 billion net loss last year, just doesn’t have that kind of money.
Congress has to come up with a plan to upgrade the postal fleet, but perhaps this is a moment to think bigger. Maybe it’s time for the USPS to pair up with an airfreight company and turn itself into a global package delivery business, just as Deutsche Post and Japan Post have done. This time around the American postal worker unions may not be a problem. Declining mail means fewer jobs. Since 2006, the USPS has eliminated 30 percent of its full-time employees.
Privatization is frightening—but just look what happened when the USPS didn’t do it.  

Tuesday, October 20, 2015

Bernie Sanders's Highly Sensible Plan to Turn Post Offices Into Banks

http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2015/10/bernie-sanders-lets-turn-post-offices-into-banks/411589/

They're much less crazy than payday-lending services, and the rest of the world agrees.

In an interview with Fusion’s Felix Salmon the day after last week’s Democratic debate and published Tuesday, Senator Bernie Sanders discussed the marquee features of democratic socialism he’s been tirelessly calling for during his presidential campaign: higher taxes for the wealthiest Americans, an increased minimum wage, and breaking up the biggest Wall Street banks.

Salmon also raised a possibility that has not been as prominent in Sanders’s stump speeches, but animates him nonetheless: turning the U.S.’s post offices into banks. Sanders:

If you are a low-income person, it is, depending upon where you live, very difficult to find normal banking. Banks don’t want you. And what people are forced to do is go to payday lenders who charge outrageously high interest rates. You go to check-cashing places, which rip you off. And, yes, I think that the postal service, in fact, can play an important role in providing modest types of banking service to folks who need it.

It’s something Sanders alluded to in a 2014 Wall Street Journal op-ed, and it’s not even the craziest idea proposed to save the USPS—a report last year explored the implications of turning post offices into hubs for 3-D printing.



In fact, Sanders’s idea is quite sensible. “Postal banking”—which just means that post offices run savings accounts, cash checks, and perform other basic financial services—is common in most of Asia and Europe, and only about 7 percent of the world’s national postal systems don’t offer some bank-like services. Postal banking is a really good way to reach people who haven’t had access to standard savings accounts. One estimate figures that more than 1 billion people have used post offices for making deposits.

The reason why this would be so useful in the U.S. is that somewhere between 20 and 40 percent of the population has to rely on check-cashing or payday-lending services, which in some places charge usurious rates that send people into spirals of recurring debt. Mehrsa Baradaran, a professor at the University of Georgia School of Law and the author of How the Other Half Banks, touched on the promise of postal banking in a book excerpt published in The Atlantic last week:

The basic idea of modern postal banking is a public bank offering a wide range of transaction services, including financial transactions, remittance, savings accounts, and small lending. These institutions would remain affordable because of economies of scale and because of the existing postal infrastructure in the U.S. Plus, in the absence of shareholders, they would not be driven to seek profits and could sell services at cost.
In her essay, Baradaran made the point that the Federal Reserve helps struggling banks through temporary credit crunches—so why doesn’t the government treat struggling individuals the same way? It’s not unheard of in the U.S.; in 1910, William Howard Taft introduced a postal-savings system for new immigrants and the poor that lasted until 1967. Today, it’d be a huge relief for people without access to banks, with an added bonus: It’d give the U.S. a leg up on Denmark, the nation that both Sanders and Hillary Clinton professed love for in the debate and which doesn’t currently have postal accounts.

Thursday, September 24, 2015

U.S. Postal Service Tries Hand as Fishmonger, Grocer

http://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-postal-service-tries-hand-as-fishmonger-grocer-1439855940

Agency ramps up same-day delivery in move to better compete with FedEx, UPS

The U.S. Postal Service uses its carriers and trucks to handle daily water delivery to businesses for NestlĂ©, whose brands includes Poland Spring, in Manhattan and Brooklyn. PHOTO: KEVIN HAGEN FOR THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

By 
LAURA STEVENS
Updated Aug. 17, 2015 8:08 p.m. ET
The U.S. Postal Service is ramping up same-day delivery of everything from bottled water to fresh fish as its new postmaster general tries to better compete with FedEx, UPS and even Amazon.com.
In New York City, letter carriers in the early morning hours load boxes of fresh and frozen seafood from Fulton Fish Market onto mail trucks and deliver them to local restaurants by 11 a.m. They collect packages from Internet electronics retailer Newegg Inc. for fast, local afternoon delivery. They’re also doing daily water delivery to businesses for NestlĂ© SA in Manhattan and Brooklyn.
Same-day delivery is part of a big push by Megan Brennan, the new postmaster general, to make the postal service more competitive.
“Clearly, the consumer demand is such that we all want the package today,” said Ms. Brennan in an interview. “So we’re being responsive to that.”
About six months after taking the top job at the quasigovernmental agency, Ms. Brennan said she’s pushing Congress to green light the shipping of alcoholic beverages. She also wants to expand grocery delivery and offer more Sunday delivery.
The postal service must grow. Volumes of first-class mail, its most profitable product, fell 2.2% through the first three quarters of the year. It has fallen about 20% over the past decade. While the agency’s package business is growing in double digits, it’s still only about a fifth of total revenue. For fiscal 2014, the agency’s revenue was $67.85 billion.
There’s “a lot of potential for the organization, particularly when you look at what I’ll call the hyper growth in e-commerce,” Ms. Brennan said.
The change in direction is causing the agency some growing pains, which were evident in its third-quarter results released last week. While shipping and package revenue rose 10.6% to $3.56 billion compared with a year ago, overall labor costs also rose.
Work hours increased by about five million hours for the quarter, and compensation grew about 2.4% to $8.8 billion. USPS Chief Financial Officer Joe Corbett said last week that the extra time it takes to deliver packages contributed to the expense.
Also, the Postal Service will delay until 2016 some of the 82 mail sorting plant closings that had been planned for this year because of service disruptions, which were caused in part by changes to thousands of employee schedules related to plant consolidation, as well as harsh winter weather. The delay was so service levels could be restored, Ms. Brennan said.
Lately, the agency has been on a tear. After launching grocery delivery with Amazon.comInc. a year ago in San Francisco, the Postal Service has added six more delivery markets this year. It began testing same-day delivery in New York this past November. It’s also shopping for 180,000 new trucks that are better designed to hold packages.
The Postal Service cut certain Priority Mail package prices last year by as much as 58% for its largest customers to attract more business. In addition, for an average of about $1.70, according to its financial filings, it will take a parcel from post office to residence for big shippers like United Parcel Service Inc., FedEx Corp. and Amazon, who are willing to sort the packages themselves.
Keith Byrd, co-founder of shipping consultancy Transportation Impact LLC, says more of his customers have either considered or have shifted parts of their package volume to the Postal Service in recent months. “Absolutely [the postal service is] taking market share from the small parcel carriers, especially on the lighter-weight e-commerce,” he added.
Both FedEx and UPS have filed complaints in the past to the postal regulator, arguing that the Postal Service doesn’t charge enough for some of its parcels. “UPS supports a healthy and viable Postal Service, but we believe that the USPS, like any other business, needs to understand the true costs for offering and expanding competitive services,” a UPS spokeswoman said. FedEx said it can’t speculate on specific pricing decisions of other carriers.
By law, the Postal Service is mandated to charge the cost of delivering a package, plus at least 5.5%. Ms. Brennan says that Postal Service packages are priced properly, but she’s considering raising rates—simply because the demand is there. She said that it’s important to ensure the Postal Service is generating more robust profit on top of revenue.
Ms. Brennan would also like to expand what the Postal Service is allowed to deliver. One of her first legislative pushes will be to gain congressional approval for shipping alcohol, she said. “Clearly, there are some who would like to see us stay in our lane if you will, but we obviously think there is opportunity for us to expand,” she said.
Last month, three bills were introduced in Congress, two in the House and one in the Senate, all with the aim of lifting the Prohibition-era ban on the Postal Service shipping alcohol. One of the legislators said the move could provide the Postal Service with an additional $50 million annually.
Ms. Brennan said she also hopes to make progress on introducing a bill to remove a congressional requirement that the agency must pay its retiree health-care benefits ahead of schedule, to the tune of more than $5 billion annually. The payment continually pushes the agency into the red.

Without that payment and workers’ compensation items, the Postal Service said it would have recorded a profit of $1.4 billion last year. It doesn’t receive direct taxpayer subsidies, but it reached its $15 billion credit limit with the Treasury Department in 2012 and also receives compensation for some services including mail for the blind.

Monday, August 17, 2015

The Postal Service Is a Civic Institution, Not a Business

http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2012/04/the-postal-service-is-a-civic-institution-not-a-business/256306/?utm_source=SFFB

This week the U.S. Senate is debating the 21st Century Postal Act of 2011, a proposal to reform the U.S. Postal Service and change the way the USPS does business in order to make it more profitable. In December, the Postal Service proposed to cut Saturday delivery, close half of its 500 processing centers around the country and dozens of local post offices, and lay off thousands of workers. The bill under consideration this week would delay closures and require studies to determine how best to proceed with any reductions in delivery.

Although those are laudable goals, they will not solve the fundamental problem: Congress assumes that this vital government service will somehow become profitable. In the midst of a long decline in the volume of mail, the demise of the Postal Service -- at least as a public institution with universal service throughout the United States -- often seems inevitable. Yet the critiques and suggestions offered as solutions for what ails the Postal Service see the problem only in terms of commercial and financial concerns.

The circumstances of the Post Office's founding suggest a far broader and more important mission: guaranteeing the sanctity of civic participation and political debate.

During the American Revolution, the post was a crucial point of contention between colonists and the Crown because it was the means for circulating not only correspondence but also newspapers, the lifeblood of intercolonial political cooperation. When British officials threatened the free circulation of news, newspaper publishers led the charge in 1774 to replace the British imperial system with a "Constitutional Post." Without a government structure, the post would be privately funded, but newspaper publishers and allies like the Boston Committee of Correspondence made sure that reliable, safe, and secure circulation of political intelligence was a primary function.

Shortly after Lexington and Concord in April 1775, the Continental Congress took up a post office as one of the earliest institutions of national reach -- making the U.S. Post Office older than the Navy, the Marines, and the Declaration of Independence. Congressional delegates therefore believed that ensuring safe communication throughout the colonies was vital to the colonies' efforts for military, political, and commercial unity.

The delegates to the Constitutional Convention of 1787 saw the operation of information channels as a core function of government: the power "to establish post offices and post roads" is one of the explicitly named grants included among the enumerated powers of Congress. At the same time, new political cleavages within the United States caused tension about the Post Office's role as an impartial circulation mechanism. During the debates over ratification in 1787 and 1788, some antifederalist printers accused the Post Office of suppressing their publications and arguments against the Constitution.

William Goddard, the mastermind of the 1774 "Constitutional Post," ominously suggested he would once again start his own postal system. The complaints of Goddard and other printers forced Congress to re-assert that the Post Office would circulate all news and information equally. In 1792, the new Federal Congress confirmed that promise in the first Post Office Act, setting the stage for a massive explosion in the newspaper industry and providing for the circulation of information to the far reaches of the country.

Understanding the core mission of the Post Office -- as part of a communications infrastructure for political debate and civic participation -- should lead us to reframe the questions we ask about the future of the USPS. Making changes to the USPS's structure are clearly necessary in order to ensure its ability to meet its obligations. But the historical context should lead us to ask much larger questions about government's role in protecting the free circulation of information. In the 18th century, the government committed itself to guaranteeing the free flow of information throughout the nation as part of a project to ensure mass participation in civic life, linking the Post Office with the protection of a free press.

The decline in mail volume points to a certain inevitability about the commercial success of the USPS. But more broadly we must carefully consider the value of publicly owned, freely available channels of communication. Should the Post Office cease to exist, we will lose the last public guarantor of free communication in the United States.


A B O U T THE A U THO R JOSEPH M. ADELMAN is a historian of the politics and media of the American Revolution. He is a National Endowment for the Humanities fellow at the American Antiquarian Society.

Friday, August 7, 2015

It’s Amazon’s World. The USPS Just Delivers in It

http://www.msn.com/en-us/money/companies/it%e2%80%99s-amazon%e2%80%99s-world-the-usps-just-delivers-in-it/ar-AAdHEQ1

In cities such as San Francisco and New York, letter carriers have been showing up on people’s doorsteps as early as 3 a.m. bearing unusual cargo: milk, eggs, and other perishable items. The U.S. Postal Service has been delivering groceries to customers of Amazon.com in selected areas since October 2014. “It’s just leveraging our infrastructure,” says Megan Brennan, who was sworn in as America’s 74th postmaster general in March, becoming the first woman to hold the job in the institution’s 240-year history. “We’re on people’s doorstep six days a week, seven days a week in some cases. It’s just a logical progression.”

A former letter carrier from Pottsville, Pa., Brennan is trying to transform the USPS into a delivery service for the e- commerce era. That means hauling fewer letters and more packages. It means showing up with them at once-unheard-of hours and even on Sundays. “Amazon is the first,” Brennan says. “But we’re obviously looking to get additional customers who are interested in that type of customized delivery.”
 
Brennan’s predecessor, Patrick Donahoe, announced in November 2013 that the Postal Service would do deliveries for Amazon seven days a week. Since then, the Seattle giant has assembled a network of more than 15 facilities where it sorts packages it then trucks to nearby post offices, so letter carriers can take them the rest of the way. Amazon said in a recent regulatory filing that it plans to build more of these sorting centers this year.

The USPS doesn’t disclose much about its relationship with Amazon, citing confidentiality agreements. Amazon didn’t respond to several requests for comment. David Vernon, an analyst at Bernstein Research who tracks the shipping industry, estimates the USPS handled 40 percent of Amazon’s volume last year—or almost 150 million items—more than either United Parcel Service or FedEx. He figures that Amazon pays the USPS $2 per package, which is about half what it would pay UPS and FedEx. Vernon says Amazon receives a deep discount from the USPS because the e- tailer does so much of its own processing—including providing computerized address lists to make it easier for carriers to tailor their delivery routes for faster drop-offs. “I think [Amazon’s] idea was, why give this volume to FedEx when we can just sort it ourselves?” Vernon says. “Because it’s not that hard.”
 
Brennan needs all the new business she can get. In 2014 first-class mail volume fell 3 percent compared with the previous year, to 64 billion pieces. Advertising mail, which some people refer to as junk mail, remained essentially unchanged. But the USPS’s package volume climbed 8 percent from the year before, to 4 billion items, and accounted for 20 percent of the agency’s $68 billion operating revenue.

Yet as its package volume rises, the USPS has had to invest in new equipment. Last year it spent $200 million to furnish its carriers with 270,000 Internet-connected handheld scanners made by Honeywell that enable them to provide real-time package tracking. “The Postal Service is far more technology-centric than most people would understand or believe,” Brennan says. The agency is also hoping to replace its fleet of 189,750 delivery trucks, most of which are 25 years old and not configured to hold packages. The USPS Office of the Inspector General estimates this will cost more than $5 billion.

These expensive upgrades come at a time when the USPS is essentially broke. It expects to lose $6.1 billion this year and as of late March had only $6 billion in cash, enough to keep running for 22 days. Brennan has been quietly calling on various political leaders and special-interest lobbyists in Washington whose support she needs to fix her troubled agency. A top priority: getting Congress to pass legislation that would require USPS retirees to use Medicare as their primary health insurance. This would eliminate the need to pay $5 billion a year to fund future retiree health benefits, as the agency is now required to do by law. It hasn’t been able to make the payments since 2011.

The USPS’s package growth gives Brennan something more pleasant to discuss with lawmakers and lobbyists than the inexorable decline of first-class mail. Even conservative Republicans, who object to proposals championed by U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren(D-Mass.) and others for the USPS to get into new businesses such as banking, want to see the agency deliver more e-commerce-generated boxes. “Nobody ever said they shouldn’t be delivering packages,” says Jason Chaffetz(R-Utah), chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, which oversees the USPS.

Postal union leaders, who don’t always see eye to eye with management, are similarly enthusiastic.

“We’ve been trying to get the Postal Service to do this kind of thing for years,” says Brian Renfroe, director of city delivery for the National Association of Letter Carriers.

The USPS says it’s making Sunday deliveries for other companies, which it refuses to name. But it may be a while before Brennan lands another client as big as Amazon, which, besides the sorting centers, has 50 enormous distribution warehouses across the U.S. “The only company in America right now that has so many distribution centers purely for e-commerce is Amazon,” says Marc Wulfraat, founder of MWPVL International, a logistics consulting firm in Montreal. “Wal-Mart’s probably the next-biggest player with, say, six or seven, and it drops off real fast after that.”

In the meantime, the USPS is tethered to Amazon, a company that isn’t just a customer—it’s also a competitor. In cities such as New York and Washington, where the USPS is testing same- day delivery, Amazon offers a similar service. The e-tailer has its own AmazonFresh grocery delivery trucks. And it’s seeking permission from the Federal Aviation Administration to make deliveries using aerial drones. Given its gargantuan ambitions, Amazon could even recruit its own army of delivery people. But Brennan isn’t concerned about that. The last thing Amazon Chief Executive Officer Jeff Bezos probably wants to do now after building all those sorting centers is hire more than 300,000 men and women to carry packages like the USPS. Even in the age of Amazon, that’s the Postal Service’s undeniable edge.

The bottom line: The U.S. Postal Service handled an estimated 40 percent of Amazon’s deliveries in 2014.

Monday, February 16, 2015

Postal Service seeks to retire the old mail truck

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/postal-seeks-retire-old-mail-001200394.html

The USPS needs 180,000 ‘next generation’ vehicles with good fuel efficiency


Mail trucks are in line for a makeover.
The boxy white vehicles first appeared 27 years ago, and consumer trends and age have now rendered them too small, inefficient and unsafe.
The U.S. Postal Service issued a request for information as the first step in replacing the aging delivery-vehicle fleet, which is suffering from wear and tear and burdening an organization already strapped for resources. General Motors Co., which supplied the chassis for the current truck, is interested in winning the contract, which could be worth more than $5 billion in revenue.
“Though the existing fleet has served the Postal Service well, it has become expensive to continue to maintain the aging vehicles. More importantly though,” said USPS spokeswoman Sarah Ninivaggi, “shifts in consumer trends are driving a lot of factors being considered in a next-generation vehicle.”
A change to the familiar trucks emblazoned with red and blue stripes and the eagle logo means a major contract for an auto maker, likely an American one. It also means big fuel savings and logistics improvements for a service that had a $5.51 billion deficit in 2014.
The proposal is for some 180,000 “next-generation delivery vehicles,” which would over time replace the 163,000 right-hand-drive, light-duty mail-delivery trucks now in use. The service says the trucks would ideally cost between $25,000 and $35,000.
The current fleet, which consists mostly of a custom aluminum Grumman body on a modified Chevrolet S-10 pickup-truck chassis, was purchased between 1987 and 1994. GM stopped making the truck more than a decade ago. Most of the trucks are more than 21 years old, and everything from windshield-wiper blades to failing engines are draining resources.
The Grumman LLVs are getting nine or 10 miles per gallon of gas due to the stop-and-go nature of most delivery routes, making their fuel efficiency closer to dump trucks than modern commercial vans. In fiscal 2014 the postal service spent about $539.7 million on fuel.
The aging fleet’s costs are so high that a report from the Office of the Inspector General of the U.S. Postal Service showed the service could sustain delivery operations nationwide only until fiscal 2017—and that was without any unexpected decreases in vehicle inventory or increases in motorized routes. The same report said repair costs were too high and recommended a long-term vehicle-replacement plan.
The old trucks were designed to deliver letters. Today, in the era of e-commerce, the service delivers more packages, and its parcel business has increased more than 20% over the past five years. The new vehicles will likely need to be larger, but they will also be more comfortable and have better engines and safety equipment, according to the request. The current trucks don’t have anti-lock brakes, air bags, electronic-stability control and a host of other safety systems that are now standard.
But like the rest of the car-buying world, letter carriers want better cupholders, too. Not only that, but they also want driver compartments without crevices that mail might slip through and sturdy sun visors than can handle having letters stuffed under them.
“The postal service is experiencing record growth in package delivery, and obtaining vehicles that are designed with the changing mail mix in mind will help improve efficiency of delivery operations,” Ms. Ninivaggi said.
She added that the postal service doesn’t have a set vision of what the truck will look like, but it could include alternative-energy options. “We’re open to any proposal we receive,” she said.
The postal service currently operates a fleet of more than 42,000 alternative fuel-capable vehicles, most of which are equipped to use E-85 fuel. In addition, USPS tests and operates electric, compressed natural gas, liquid propane gas, fuel cell and bio-diesel vehicles.
Ms. Ninivaggi said the postal service will hold a conference on Feb. 18 to field questions from potential suppliers about the technical requirements, acquisition process and program schedule.
“It’s the right time not only because of maintenance challenges but because it’s a good opportunity to improve efficiency,” she said.
It’s unclear where the funds for the new order will come from. The USPS loses money each year because of prepayments for retiree health benefits. In addition, it has tapped out its $15 billion credit line from the Treasury.
Still, it has committed $500 million to vehicle maintenance and replacement this year, up from $100 million last year.
Ford Motor Co., Nissan Motor Co. and Fiat Chrysler Automobiles NV have recently put out commercial delivery vans in the U.S. that have higher fuel economy than outgoing models.
Ford spokesman Mike Levine wouldn’t speculate on “potential customer orders” but noted that Ford has “commercial-grade solutions that can be tailored to meet a wide variety of business or fleet needs.” Nissan said it isn’t involved yet.
GM spokesman Bob Wheeler said the postal service is an “important customer” and “we are early in the process of exploring potential solutions that would work for their needs.”
Chrysler spokesman Nick Cappa confirmed FCA US has received a request for information and said “we are reviewing it.”

Saturday, January 17, 2015

How Japan's Postal Service Got $3 Trillion

This article is from 2005, but provides useful historical content:
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/explainer/2005/08/how_japans_postal_service_got_3_trillion.html

A parliamentary vote on whether to privatize Japan's state-owned postal service has been delayed until Monday. Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi is pushing hard for the reformation of Japan Post, which holds about $2.9 trillion in savings and insurance deposits, making it for all practical purposes the world's biggest bank. How did Japan's postal service get so rich?

DANIEL ENGBER
Daniel Engber is a columnist forSlate. 
Postal savings accounts. For 130 years, the postal system has served as a local savings bankfor anyone with a cent to spare. (In the early days, you could start an account with a deposit as small as one two-hundredth of a yen.) Postal savings began a few years after the postal service was founded in 1871, and several years before the first private savings bank opened in Tokyo. Today, Japan Post holds about a third of all personal savings in the country. (It does not make big profits from mail delivery.)
The post runs around 25,000 branch offices, where you can send letters, deposit money, make payments, or buy insurance. It also owns far more ATMs than any commercial bank and offers competitive interest rates. But its biggest selling point may be financial security. Customers have repeatedly flocked to the postal system during major banking crises like that of the 1990s.  
Japan wasn't the first country to implement a postal savings system. The United Kingdom started the trend in 1861 and was followed by New Zealand, Canada, and Belgium. Within a few decades, more than a dozen postal banks emerged in large, industrialized nations. The United States created its own in 1910 after years of wrangling and almost 80 failed attempts to pass a law. A banking panic in 1907 finally pushed the proposal onto the Republican platform and through Congress.
Postal savings systems were popular because they offered financial services to everyone, including poor, rural people who weren't served by private, big-city institutions. When the U.S. system was created, most postal deposits came from immigrants seeking refuge from informal community banks; later, during the Great Depression, postal savings were seen as a safe alternative to accounts at commercial institutions.
But the American version couldn't compete with the private banks. The post office never offered insurance or direct money transfers, and postal interest rates were held at 2 percent even as competitors offered better deals. Deposits dwindled, and the system was shut down in 1966. Many other systems around the world have been abolished or privatized. The British postal banking system was privatized and sold to the Alliance & Leicester Group 15 years ago.
The Japanese postal service, which has benefited from tax and regulatory advantages, has outgrown and "outlasted" almost every other postal savings systems in the world. The government invests its savings deposits in industry, transportation, the military, and social programs. Critics call this an inefficient—or even corrupt—way to invest the nation's money. Prime Minister Koizumi supports splitting Japan Post into four private businesses. One would manage savings deposits, another would handle insurance, and the remaining two would provide for mail delivery and postal services.

How Obama Can Help Rescue the Postal Service Right Now

http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/Columns/2014/12/28/How-Obama-Can-Help-Rescue-Postal-Service-Right-Now

The Fiscal Times
December 28, 2014
The U.S. Postal Service is going out of business, partly because of mismanagement. As a functioning business, its board of directors would have been replaced years ago.
The Postal Service has been reeling from threats to its financial stability. The Board of Governors sets budgets, pricing and policy for the Postal Service. Despite six years of a Democratic president, Republicans have held for years the majority of the board’s occupied slots. As a result, the reaction to diminished physical mail traffic and an unworkable retirement funding mandate from Congress (the Postal Service must pre-fund its retirement benefits 75 years out, a demand placed on no other federal agency or private business) has been mostly about job and service cuts.
There is a possible solution. And it could come in 2015.
One of the few bright spots of the past two years in Congress has been the Senate’s success in presidential and judicial confirmations. After Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) invoked the so-called “nuclear option,” lowering the threshold for confirming nominees to a majority vote, the Senate secured one of President Obama’s enduring legacies by seating more judges on the federal bench than at any time over the past 20 years.
The president has now confirmed more judges in his first six years than Ronald Reagan, Bill Clinton or George W. Bush did. The president’s nominees for executive agencies also moved through the Senate with far more speed than in prior years.
That’s great news for the smooth functioning of government. But one agency in particular has been left behind, with its nominees stalled and its operations in danger. The president has the opportunity to remedy this with the stroke of a pen by making recess appointments to the Postal Service Board of Governors.
According to the Senate’s executive calendar, hundreds of nominees awaited confirmation at the adjournment of the Congressional session. Under the standing rules of the Senate, these nominations were returned to the president for re-nomination next year, when Republicans will control the chamber.
The lion’s share of these appointments are for members of the military or the foreign service, with a couple high-profile nominations like Attorney General candidate Loretta Lynch, and a few key jobs at the Treasury and Defense Departments. But no federal agency will suffer as much for this inability to confirm nominees as the United States Postal Service, the nation’s second-largest employer.
The Postal Service Board of Governors, effectively the board of directors for the agency, has eleven slots. Two are for the Postmaster General and deputy, and the other nine are selected by the president and confirmed by the Senate, with no more than five of the nine from the party in the White House.
When the Board of Governors’ chair, Mickey Barnett, had to leave his post on December 8 that left a whopping six vacant slots. With no incoming nominees confirmed before the Senate left town, the board is now operating without a quorum. Rather than lose the ability to function, the board created a temporary emergency committee allowing the remaining members to provide “continuity of operations.” This is the first time the USPS board has ever resorted to such a contingency, and the legal rationale could easily be challenged.
Postmaster General Patrick Donahoe, who is retiring in February (the Board of Governors already chose his replacement, key deputy Megan Brennan), has proposed the elimination of nearly one-third of its workforce by 2015, the sharpest drop-off in employment in USPS history. He has stuck to this plan despite resistance from Congress. “Innovation” for Donahoe translates into mail processing center closures, reduced hours, repeated attempts to end Saturday delivery and partial privatization through partnerships with retail outlets like Staples. Lower service standardsscheduled to take place on January 5 will practically eliminate overnight mail and tee up the closures of 82 more mail processing plants.
A revitalized Board of Governors could fix this, not just by stopping the cuts, but with new ideas aimed at building the USPS rather than tearing it down. For example, the board could test the long-discussed option of postal service banking, providing an alternative for millions of families with little or no access to financial services, who currently rely on costly options like check cashing stores or payday lenders. Two nominees who failed to get confirmed this month, Victoria Kennedy (Ted’s widow) and Stephen Crawford, expressed support for postal banking in their confirmation hearing.
Beyond banking, the long-awaited Democratic majority on the Board of Governors could embark on experiments that take advantage of the Postal Services’ vast resources of physical and human capital. They could make decisions in the interest of employees, rather than just lazy cost cutting, to bring the Postal Service into the 21st century.
But to get this done, President Obama will have to dip into an 18th century Constitutional provision, the recess appointment. Article II, Section 2 gives the president “Power to fill up all vacancies that may happen during the Recess of the Senate.”
The recess appointment power drew some controversy when it was last used. In June, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously that the president made appointments to the National Labor Relations Board illegally, when Congress was still in session and holding “pro forma” sessions. However, they did not invalidate the recess appointment power entirely, as even the Court’s most conservative members reaffirmed recess appointments during breaks between Senate sessions. That’s precisely the moment we’re in today. As long as the Senate breaks are longer than 10 days in length, according to the Court, recess appointments are allowable.
Moreover, President Obama’s philosophy on recess appointments fits with the position the Postal Service Board of Governors finds itself in right now. He could theoretically make any recess appointments he wants — it’d certainly be easier to install a new ambassador to Cuba now, rather than try to get one through a Republican Senate. But the National Labor Relations Board had no quorum before Obama recess-appointed three nominees in 2012. He also placed Richard Cordray as director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, because the agency could not perform key operations without a director in place.
The Postal Service board suffers from the same problems today: no quorum, and uncertainty about exercising its agency powers. That makes it a prime candidate for recess appointments. Especially when the nominees have been waiting so long. Stephen Crawford was first nominated in June 2012; David Bennett has been lingering since April 2013.
The Postal Service is in crisis. Its rules are onerous and impossible to manage, and it faces severe threats from within. Ultimately the agency needs Congressional action to relieve it of its funding burdens and grant more authority to innovate. But the Board of Governors could start by using existing authority to turn around the entire direction of the Postal Service. The president can lead the way by employing the document Republicans constantly accuse him of ignoring — the Constitution.

Friday, January 2, 2015

Why you got so few Christmas cards this year

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/why-you-got-so-few-christmas-cards-this-year-2014-12-23

When wishing friends and loved ones a merry Christmas, it’s no longer necessary to murder a tree first.
A decade ago Americans mailed off two billion Christmas cards, according to Hallmark. But thanks to Facebook, FaceTime, Snapchat, and other digital modes of spreading holiday cheer, the number of paper cards delivered has dropped 30%.
Though 1.4 billion cards is still a pretty sizable print circulation, Hallmark says customers are becoming more selective about who is and isn’t worthy of the old-school cards.
“We find that people tend to buy those for close family members and for people they want to express appreciation to, like teachers and care givers,” said Kristi Ernsting, a Hallmark spokeswoman.
Younger families tend to choose cards which they can personalize with family photos. In fact, Hallmark offers a mobile phone app that allows users to print cards with photos from their smartphones.
Monica Fitzgerald, who lives in Washington, D.C., said she uses customized Christmas cards.
“You can also personalize it with notes that you either preprint on it, or actually write on the back,” Fitzgerald said.
Fitzgerald also said the number of cards she has sent out has gone down from 100 to about 40, she usually does not send them to friends she isn't already connected to through social media.
John Bonham, a resident of Cortland, N.Y., said the number of Christmas cards he has sends and receives has declined over the years.
“We used to get at the house about maybe 10 to 15 a Christmas season,” Bonham said in an email. He blames the cards themselves, which are now “way too overpriced.”
Bonham has said he reserves traditional paper cards for a select few relatives and friends because he typically sees or calls most of the people he would send cards to on a regular basis.
“In fact, even when I did send cards, the people I sent the majority to would be at my house on Christmas anyway,” Bonham said. “The Internet and social media has pretty much eliminated the need for them.”

U.S. Postal Service eyes e-commerce to offset declining mail

http://www.msn.com/en-us/money/technology/us-postal-service-eyes-e-commerce-to-offset-declining-mail/ar-BBhc2kg

Facing a slump in the mail it had been delivering since the days of America's Revolutionary War, in 2012 the U.S. Postal Service began aggressively targeting e-commerce and lapsed customers as the way to salvage its declining business.
"Really it started almost at the level of cold-calling, talking to people who really hadn't spoken to us in a long time," said Nagisa Manabe, who joined the USPS in May 2012 as chief marketing and sales officer from Coca-Cola Co after a career in the private sector. "And really trying to persuade them to consider us as a very viable alternative in the shipping market."
With further drops in its traditional bread-and-butter products ahead, the USPS wants to capitalize on e-commerce, which consulting firm Detroit LLP has predicted should grow 14 percent this holiday season alone. But industry experts question whether the USPS has enough space in its delivery vans and whether its unionized work force can handle a greater proportion of the e-commerce market.
Over the past two years the USPS has rolled out real-time scanning for packages, a vital tool for online retailers and consumers alike to track their packages. It is also upgrading all of its delivery workers' handheld scanners.
The rise of the Internet has taken a heavy toll on first-class mail, the USPS's most profitable product. That falling business played a significant role in the USPS's fiscal 2014 loss of $5.5 billion, its eighth consecutive year in the red.
From 2009 to 2013, the volume of first-class mail deliveries dropped more than 20 percent. In the fiscal year ending Sept. 30, USPS deliveries declined to 155.4 billion pieces from 158.2 billion. First-class deliveries accounted for 2.2 billion pieces of that decline.
But package deliveries rose to more than 4 billion pieces from 3.7 billion, accounting for $1.1 billion of the USPS's revenue growth of $1.9 billion. In the run-up to Christmas, the USPS has been doing Sunday deliveries for Amazon.com Inc in a number of cities. Manabe adds that the agency will handle the online retailer's push into same-day and next-day deliveries "in many markets."
EBay Inc is another major customer and Manabe says "pretty much anyone who's in the e-commerce space at least does some volume with us."
FLEET OVERHAUL
Many in the delivery industry are waiting to see how the USPS has handled surging e-commerce volumes in the days before Christmas.
The USPS's competitive advantage lies in the fact that it already delivers to every house in America and analysts estimate it can do so for around a quarter of the cost charged by United Parcel Service Inc and FedEx Corp, which are both competitors and customers of the USPS.
"The U.S. Postal Service has the ultimate last-mile delivery network, so it has a real opportunity here," said Vinnie DeAngelis, vice president of postal relations at Neopost USA, which provides tracking and other software for e-commerce retailers and delivery companies.
According to shipment-tracking software developer ShipMatrix Inc, in 2013 the USPS accounted for 59.2 percent of e-commerce deliveries, while UPS accounted for 31.9 percent and FedEx 8.9 percent. The USPS has predicted holiday package volume growth of around 12 percent this year from Nov. 17 to Christmas.
In the years ahead, the USPS expects 80 percent of U.S. ZIP codes will see "significantly more business," Manabe said. But many of the USPS's current delivery vehicles are more than 25 years old and built for mail instead of larger packages.
"They (the USPS) tend to operate smaller vehicles that really cube out (fill up) pretty quickly as opposed to the network we have in place," FedEx Executive Vice President Michael Glenn said during a Dec. 17 earnings conference call with analysts. Delivery companies measure their vehicles' three-dimensional space in cubes.
The USPS plans to spend more than $10 billion over the next four years on a new fleet of vehicles. Manabe said that could mean three or four different sizes of vehicles to handle different package volumes in urban and rural areas.
Some industry experts are concerned that the USPS, whose operations are dictated by Congress, may have trouble handling e-commerce growth due to its quasi-government unionized workers.
"When I think about the USPS business model, I don't believe they are ever going to get the productivity of FedEx or UPS," said Brian Hancock, a board member of the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals.
But Manabe insists the unionized work force is on board and recognizes the importance of e-commerce.
The last few delivery days before Christmas have been a test for the USPS. After struggling with a late surge in online orders last year that left an estimated 2 million packages stranded on Christmas Eve, UPS and FedEx both made it clear this year that they would reject a last-minute flood of packages if it threatened their systems.
Rick Jones, a former UPS executive and now CEO of regional delivery company Lone Star Overnight, says that for many retailers this holiday season, the USPS may have become the carrier of last resort.
"The question is whether their smaller vehicles, which are designed for mail rather than packages, could handle the extra volume," he said.